how we check this
Every figure on this site is tied to a source with the date we read it, and the build refuses to publish a page containing a number that is not.
the gate
Publishing runs through a script that fails the build, not a checklist someone is supposed to remember. It refuses a page for any of these:
- a number in the text that no source declares
- a source with no evidence, or no date, or a date older than 30 days
- a screenshot of a click path the capture rig has not run in the last 7 days
- slang in the same sentence as a figure, a setting or a warning
- more than one call to action, or a raw referral URL anywhere in the body
- a guarantee, a price target, or an invented trading history
Our decorative editorial illustrations are AI-generated. They are separate from platform screenshots and transaction evidence.
what we say when we do not know
Where a venue publishes no rate we can verify, we say that instead of estimating. Where two readings of a venue's own documentation disagree, both are on the page and we flag the gap rather than picking the flattering one.
one venue per page
A page about one trading venue never links to another one. Not in the navigation, not in the related questions, not in the footer. Mixing venues is the clearest tell of a link farm, and it is also just bad for you: the answer to an Axiom question is not on a Hyperliquid page.
how we get paid
Referral commissions, disclosed on every page that carries a link, with the arithmetic shown. Every link and what it pays us.
corrections
Rate tables move without notice. The date on each page is when a person last checked it against the source, not when the file changed. If a figure here is stale, the date will show it before you have to find out the expensive way.